Search for: "JONATHAN L. ANDERSON" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2014, 3:00 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) September 25, 2014Jonas Anderson on how courts compete for patent cases, and what to do about it: http://t.co/qqhs8WktoR (forthcoming @PennLawReview)— Lisa L. [read post]
16 May 2008, 6:35 pm
Anderson Court-Ordered Restrictions on Trial Participant Speech Jonathan Eric Pahl The Continued Relevance of the Irrelevance-of-Motive Maxim Michael T. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 7:01 am by David Pocklington
Whilst transatlantic slavery is per se outwith the scope of L&RUK, it has a direct bearing to consistory court judgments concerning “contested heritage“. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:08 pm by Dan Auerbach and Dan Auerbach
Bellovin, Columbia University Matt Blaze, University of Pennsylvania Scott Bradner, Harvard University Eric Burger, Georgetown University L. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Matar is expected to l appear in  court once again on September 22. [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:40 am by Katherine Pompilio
Jonathan Schroden discussed new approaches for counterterrorism in Afghanistan. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.O’Mahony, David and Jonathan Doak. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  On Thursday, the Committee voted 12-10 along party lines to authorize Committee Chair Lindsey Graham to unilaterally issue subpoenas related to this Judiciary Committee "oversight" investigation, including to 53 specifically named current and former officials from the FBI, DOJ and the Intelligence Community:  Trisha Anderson, Brian Auten, James Baker, William Barr, Dana Boente, Jennifer Boone, John Brennan, James Clapper, Kevin Clinesmith, James Comey, Patrick… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
    Before I address this argument, it’s important to note that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell appears to have abandoned two other insurrection-related arguments that Trump made in the Colorado courts:  (i) that the violence at the Capitol on January 6 did not constitute an “insurrection” at all; and (ii) that inciting or aiding an insurrection doesn’t constitute “engaging in” it. [read post]